Method for using compositions containing fluorocarbinols in lithographic processes

ABSTRACT

The present invention involves a method for generating a photoresist image on a substrate. The method comprises coating a substrate with a film comprising a polymer comprising fluorocarbinol monomers; imagewise exposing the film to radiation; heating the film to a temperature of, at, or below about 90° C. and developing the image. The present invention also relates to a method for generating a photoresist image on a substrate where a polymer comprising fluorocarbinol monomers is used as a protective top coat.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 11/495,038, filed on Jul. 28, 2006, which is incorporated byreference in its entirety herein.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to the field of lithography andsemiconductor fabrication. More specifically, the invention relates tomaterials with acid-labile tertiary ester groups containingfluorocarbinols in lithographic photoresist processes.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Patterning of radiation sensitive polymeric films (referred to asphotoresists) using photons, electrons, or ion beams is a critical stepin the manufacture of semiconductor devices. The incident radiationincludes commonly used wavelengths of 436, 365, 257, 248, 193 and 157nanometers, ‘soft’ x-ray (so-called extreme ultraviolet (EUV), 13.5 nm)and x-ray radiation, and beams of ions or electrons. Patterns aredefined by irradiation through a patterned mask (in the case of optical,EUV, x-ray, and projection electron beam lithography) or via a directwrite process in the case of electron or ion beam lithography. Theincident radiation induces a chemical change in the photoresist filmwhich causes a physical (e.g., molecular weight or thermal stability) orchemical (solubility) property of the exposed material to differ fromthat of material in the unexposed regions. Subsequent developmentprocesses can selectively remove the material in either the exposed orunexposed region. Typically, this involves rinsing the exposed siliconwafer with a developer such as aqueous tetramethylammonium hydroxide.

Photoresists are generally formulated to contain a matrix polymer, aradiation sensitive compound/functionality, and performance modifiers(e.g., dissolution inhibitors and bases quenchers) in a solvent suitablefor spin-casting. While early photoresists relied on direct interactionof incident radiation with the radiation sensitivecompound/functionality, the low quantum efficiency of this approach isunsuitable for high resolution imaging in which high sensitivity to lowdoses of radiation is required. Subsequently, “chemically-amplified”resists have been developed in which the incident radiation interactswith a radiation sensitive compound/functionality to produce a speciescapable of performing a catalytic reaction on a large number offunctional groups to induce a large property change from a low exposuredose. Typically, chemically-amplified resists are designed with acompound, referred to as a photoacid generator (PAG), which produces astrong acid when exposed to radiation of the appropriate wavelength.This strong acid catalyzes chemical reactions such as the deprotectionof acid-labile protecting groups (typically positive tone photoresists)or the polymerization of acid-sensitive groups such as epoxides or thereaction of polymer-bound functionalities with crosslinking agents(negative-tone photoresists). In this manner the quantum efficiency ofthe overall process can approach or even exceed a value of one. Theparticular chemical structures of the functional groups attached to thematrix polymer is particularly important since it, typically, definesthe tone (positive or negative) and imaging performance of thephotoresist.

In practice, many properties of the photoresist and its componentsdetermine its imaging performance. The non-radiation sensitivecomponents of the formulation must be relatively transparent(particularly with optical lithography) to avoid non-productiveattenuation of the incident radiation. In optical lithography, theultimate achievable resolution is a function of the wavelength of theincident radiation according to the Rayleigh equation:R=k ₁λ/NA  (1)where λ is the wavelength of the incident radiation, NA is the numericalaperture of the lens system, and k₁ is a process-dependent factortypically between 0.5 and 0.25. In order to achieve smaller featuresizes, industry has traditionally moved to shorter wavelengths of light,often requiring redesign of photoresists to accommodate the newradiation wavelength. For example, photoresist polymers based on4-hydroxystyrene and its copolymers are widely used with 248 nmradiation due to their high resistance to etch processes and hightransparency; however, these aromatic polymers are not useful forimaging with 193 nm radiation due to their heavy absorbance.Subsequently, new photoresists based on acrylate, methacrylate, orcyclic olefin polymers were developed which are transparent at 193 nm.Carbon-rich, alicyclic groups have been particularly featured due totheir good transparency and high etch resistance.

In order to achieve even smaller features using the same incidentradiation source, immersion lithography has been developed in which amedium with a refractive index greater than air (or vacuum) is placedbetween the final lens element and the photoresist. Most commonly, thisinvolves the use of water in 193 nm immersion lithography; however,higher index aqueous and organic fluids have been demonstrated for 193nm and 157 nm immersion lithography. The chemistry of the photoresistmust be tailored such that the photoresist does not dissolve or swell inthe immersion medium. Sometimes a sacrificial protective topcoat film isdeposited on top of the photoresist to prevent leaching of photoresistcomponents (e.g., PAG, quencher, matrix resin) into the immersionmedium. The topcoat also controls the surface energy of the film stack,controlling the contact angle of the immersion fluid in contact with thesurface. High fluid contact angles have been shown to facilitate rapidscanning of the immersion lens across the wafer surface without leavingresidual droplets of fluid behind, which can lead to defects. Thechemistry and the topcoat material are matched to afford goodcompatibility and imaging performance.

Since the dimensions of image features and characteristics such as lineedge roughness (or line width variation) are of the same order as theradius of gyration of typical polymeric photoresist matrix resins, newarchitectural variants of the polymeric matrix resins have beendeveloped including branched and hyper-branched polymers and oligomers.In the extreme case, functionalized-monomeric compounds (so-called“molecular resists” or “molecular glasses”) based on well-definedcompounds such as cyclodextrins, polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes,or adamantane have been functionalized and implemented in photoresistcompositions.

Unfortunately, changes in the chemistry of photoresist materials affectnot only the transparency of the photoresist but its dissolutionbehavior during development. Poly(4-hydroxystyrene)-based 248 nmphotoresists dissolve uniformly in industry standard 0.262 Ntetramethylammonium hydroxide developer with no swelling at the onset ofdissolution. Further modification of the dissolution behavior ispossible through the use of protecting/crosslinking groups anddissolution inhibitors. However, typical acrylate, methacrylate, andcyclic olefin photoresists used with 193 nm radiation swell during theinitial stages of development, affording non-uniform dissolution.Photoresists based on fluoroalcohols have been developed for 157 nm and193 nm imaging. The inductive stabilization of the conjugate base ofthese alcohols by the heavily electron-withdrawing groups can result ina pKa similar to that of phenol and can render these functional groupssoluble in aqueous base. Fluoroalcohol based resists have been shown tooffer linear dissolution behavior with little swelling.

Another possible approach to improve the ultimate resolution ofphotoresists is to bake them at low temperatures after exposure. In thismanner, the diffusion of the photoacid can be limited and can result inlower image blur. This approach necessitates the use of a protectinggroup with a low activation energy for acid-catalyzed deprotection. Ithas also been shown in the literature that the rate of acid-catalyzedreactions in the photoresist is heavily affected by the polarity of themedium (i.e., higher polarity media facilitates more rapid reactions atlower temperatures and lower polarity media requires higher temperaturesto achieve similar reaction rates). Unfortunately, many of the commonacid-labile protecting groups are simple hydrocarbons which reduce theoverall polarity of the photoresist film and raise the requiredpost-exposure bake temperatures and increase image blur.

Photoresists based on fluoroalcohols have been developed for 157 nm and193 nm imaging have been described in the patent literature. A class oftertiary acrylate esters containing fluoroalcohol groups has beenreported in JP 2005132827. However, the presence of heavilyelectron-withdrawing fluorinated groups adjacent to the ester in thesecompounds will hinder the formation of the intermediate carbocationduring deprotection to significantly limit the cleavage of theprotecting group under acid catalysis and substantially interfere withthe performance of the resist. Several types of tertiary acrylate estersand acetals containing fluoroalcohol groups have been described in JP2005099276, US 2005026074, JP 2005004159, JP 2004069981, and JP2004069921. These monomers generally have multiple fluoroalcohol groupswhich will impart very high solubility (and dark loss) to the resist.Acetal-based protecting groups require water to be present for thedeprotection reaction and therefore are disfavored in the industry.Several other monomers require long, inefficient syntheses employingoxidation/reduction sequences and/or rely on non-commercially availablestarting materials. There is a need for lithographic methods usingimproved photoresists which can be synthesized on a commercial scalewith commercially available materials to provide enhanced lithographicperformance.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

The present invention comprises a method for generating a photoresistimage on a substrate. The method involves first coating the substratewith a photoresist film comprising a macromolecule or a polymercomprising a monomer. The macromolecule and the monomer each have theformula:

where R₀ is selected from a molecular glass, C₂₋₂₀ alkylenyl andfluorinated alkylenyl, and C₄₋₄₀ cycloalkylenyl and fluorinatedcycloalkylenyl, each optionally substituted with one or moreheteroatoms;

-   -   R₁ and R₂ are independently selected from C₁₋₂₀ alkyl and        further R₁ and R₂ can be bonded together to form a cyclic group;    -   L is a divalent C₁₋₂₀ alkyleneyl or cycloalkyleneyl optionally        substituted with C₁₋₂₀ alkyl and fluoroalkyl and C₄₋₃₀        cycloalkyl optionally substituted with a substituent selected        from one or more hydroxyl, fluoro and heteroatom substituents;    -   R₄ is selected from hydrido, trifluoromethyl, difluoromethyl,        fluoromethyl, C₁₋₂₀ alkyl and C₄₋₂₀ cycloalkyl each optionally        substituted with one or more fluoro substituents; and    -   R₅ is selected from trifluoromethyl, difluoromethyl,        fluoromethyl, C₁₋₂₀ alkyl and C₄₋₂₀ cycloalkyl each substituted        with one or more fluoro substituents and further R₄ and R₅ can        be linked to form a cyclic group.        After the film has been coated onto the substrate, the film is        imagewise exposed to radiation. The film is then heated film to        a temperature at or below about 90° C. The image is then        developed to the substrate using art known techniques.

The polymer can optionally comprise other monomers which are desired toenhance performance. The film generally comprises a photoacid generator.The film can also comprise other desired additives such as otherpolymers, solvents, quenchers, dissolution inhibitors, dyes, surfactantsand the like.

The method of the present invention can also be utilized in immersionlithography where a liquid having an index of refraction greater thanabout 1.40 is disposed on the film during the exposure of the film toradiation.

The present invention also relates to the use of the polymer of theinvention as an additive to a resist formulation and also as aprotective top coat film over a photoresist film during a lithographicprocess.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a contrast curve for photoresist polymers used in the presentinvention;

FIG. 2 is a contrast curve for photoresist polymers used in the presentinvention;

FIG. 3 is a contrast curve film for photoresist polymers used in thepresent invention;

FIG. 4 is a graph showing dissolution rates of polymers used in thepresent invention;

FIG. 5 are photographs of resist images created by the method of thepresent invention;

FIG. 6 are photographs of resist images created by the method of thepresent invention;

FIG. 7 is a contrast curve for photoresist polymers used in the presentinvention;

FIG. 8 is a contrast curve for photoresist polymers used in the presentinvention;

FIG. 9 shows photographs of resist images created by the method of thepresent invention;

FIG. 10 is a contrast curve for photoresist polymers used in the presentinvention;

FIG. 11 is a contrast curve for photoresist polymers used in the presentinvention;

FIG. 12 shows photographs of resist images created by the method of thepresent invention;

FIG. 13 is a contrast curve for photoresist polymers used in the presentinvention; and

FIG. 14 are photographs of resist images created by the method of thepresent invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention involves a method for generating a photoresistimage on a substrate. The method comprises (a) coating a substrate witha film comprising a macromolecule or a polymer comprising monomers ofthe present invention; (b) imagewise exposing the film to radiation; (c)heating the film to a temperature at or below about 90° C.; and (d)developing the image.

The method involves first coating the substrate with a photoresist film.In one embodiment, the film comprises a polymer comprising a monomer.The monomer has the formula shown above in the summary of the invention.In one embodiment of the invention, R₀ of the monomer has the formula:

where R₆, R₇ and R₈ are independently select from hydrido, fluoro andC₁₋₅ alkyl, however, preferably only one substituent is alkyl. Inanother embodiment, R₀ has the formula:

where R₉ is selected from hydrido, fluoro or C₁₋₂₀ alkyl optionallysubstituted with one or more fluoro substituents;

-   -   R₁₀ and R₁₁ are independently selected from hydrido, fluoro and        C₁₋₂₀ alkyl;    -   each X represents a divalent substituent independently selected        from carbonyl, oxygen, sulfur, methylene, ethylene,        >C(R₁₂)(R₁₃), >C═CHR₁₂, >C═C(R₁₂)(R₁₃) and >NR where R, R₁₂ and        R₁₃ are independently selected from hydrido, fluoro and C₁₋₂₀        alkyl optionally substituted with one or more fluoro        substituents and where R₁₂ and R₁₃ can be linked to form a        cyclic group; and    -   where y is 0 to 4 and where z is 0 or 1.

In still another embodiment, R₀ is selected from a molecular glass. Amolecular glass is a nonolymeric macromolecule having a molecular weightof greater than 500 daltons which forms an amorphous glassy film at roomtemperature. The molecular glass preferably has a glass transitiontemperature greater than about 75° C. Suitable molecular glasssubstituents include functionalized or non-functionalized compounds suchas adamantane, norbornene, cyclodextrin, calzarene, resorcinarene,pyrogallolarene or a silicon cage compounds such as POSS. Themacromolecule comprising a fluorocarbinol substituted molecular glassprovides a suitable molecular glass resist for use in the presentinvention.

In another embodiment of the invention, L is selected from divalentpropylenely and —CHR₁₄—CHR₁₅—CH₂—CH₂—. In the later example, the monomerhas the formula:

where R₁₄ and R₁₅ are independently selected from hydrido and C₁₋₂₀alkyl optionally substituted with one or more fluoro substituents,provided that R₂ can be linked with either or both R₁₄ and R₁₅ to form acyclic group and that R₁₄ and R₁₅ can be linked to form a cyclic group.

In the present invention, suitable unsubstituted or substituted cyclic(including polycyclic) substituents are comprised of 1 to 5 joinedrings; and examples of substituents include, but are not limited to:

where X represents methylene (CH₂), ethylene (CH₂CH₂), substitutedmethylene (C(R₂₉)(R₃₀), C═CHR₂₉, or C═C(R₂₉)(R₃₀) where R₂₉ and R₃₀ areselected from hydrido, fluoro and a linear or branched alkyleneyl groupof 1 to 20 carbons, or a semi- or perfluorinated linear or branchedalkyl group of 1 to 20 carbons), carbonyl (CO), oxygen (O), sulfur (S),and aliphatic amine (NR); and where R₂₉ and R₃₀ can be taken together toform a fused cyclic aliphatic group of 1 to 20 carbons.

In another embodiment, L is >CHR₁₆ and the monomer has the formula:

where R₁₆ is C₁₋₂₀ alkyl optionally substituted with one or more fluorosubstituents and where R₁₆ and R₂ can be linked to form a cyclic group.

In another embodiment, the monomer only has fluoro substituents on R₄and R₅ and optionally at least 3 fluoro substituents. Suitably, thepolymer has a molecular weight of about 1000 to 100,000 daltons andpreferably about 5000 to about 30,000 daltons.

The term “alkyl” as used herein refers to a branched or unbranchedsaturated hydrocarbon substituent. The term “cyclic” and “cyclo” shallrefer to cyclic non-aromatic compounds, substituents or linkages andshall include polycyclic compounds and substituents and linkagesincluding bicyclic. The term “cycloalkyl” as used herein refers to ahydrocarbon substituent whose structure is characterized by a closedring and shall include compounds which also have one or more mono ordivalent alkyl groups attached to the closed ring. The term “alkoxy” asused herein refers to a substituent —O—R where R is an alkyl group. Theterm “alkylenyl” as used herein refers to a branched or unbranchedunsaturated hydrocarbon substituent having at least one double bond(such as R—HC═CH—R—; H₂C═CH—R—; and R—HC═CH— where R is alkyl). The term“alkyleneyl” as used herein refers to a divalent alkyl group. The term“heteroatom” as used herein shall mean a divalent atom selected fromnitrogen, oxygen or sulfur positioned within an alkyl group (such as—CH₂—NH—CH₂—). The term polymer as used herein shall mean a largemolecule made up of simple repeating units (monomers) and shall includeoligomers (low molecular weight polymers) and cage silicon compoundssuitable as molecular glass resists.

Suitably, in the method of the present invention, the photoresist filmalso comprises a photo or thermal acid generator. The photoacidgenerator may be any compound that, upon exposure to radiation,generates a strong acid and is compatible with the other components ofthe photoresist composition. Any suitable photoacid generator can beused in the photoresist compositions of the invention. Examples ofsuitable PAGs include, but are not limited to, sulfonates, onium salts,aromatic diazonium salts, sulfonium salts, diaryliodonium salts andsulfonic acid esters of N-hydroxyamides or N-hydroxyimides, as disclosedin U.S. Pat. No. 4,731,605. Suitably, the PAG should have high thermalstability (i.e., be stable to at least 120° C.) so they are not degradedduring the exposure process.

The first step of the present invention involves suitably coating asubstrate with a film of the present invention dissolved in a suitablesolvent. Suitable substrates include, for example, silicon dioxide,silicon nitride and silicon oxynitride. Suitable solvents includecyclohexanone, ethyl acetate and propylene glycol methyl ether acetate.The film can be coated on the substrate using art known techniques sucha spray or spin coating or doctor blading. Suitably, before the film isexposed to radiation, the film is heated to an elevated temperature ofabout 90 to 150° C. for a short period of time to remove excess solvent.The dried film suitably has a thickness of about 0.1 to 5.0 microns.

The film is then imagewise exposed to an energy flux of radiation ofx-ray, electron beam or ultraviolet. Suitable radiation has a wavelengthof less than 206 nm, and preferably less than 200 nm (e.g., 193 nm).Suitable radiation sources are ArF excimer and KrF excimer lasers.Conveniently, due to the enhanced sensitivity of the resist film, aresist film of 1 micron thickness is fully exposed with less than about50 mJ/cm² and preferably less than about 30 mJ/cm². The radiation isabsorbed by the resist composition and suitably a radiation sensitiveacid generator to generate free acid.

After exposure to radiation, the film is again heated to a lowtemperature of about 90° C. or less or at or below 90° C. for a shortperiod time of about 1-2 minute(s) to cause cleavage of the acidcleavable ester substituent in the exposed portion of the resistcomposition with subsequent formation of the corresponding acid. Becausethis reaction can be processed at this lower temperature, there issubstantially less diffusion of the photogenerated acid into unexposedareas of the film. This reaction proceeds at this low temperature due tothe lower activation energy of the acid cleavable monomer in theinventive process. In another embodiment, the film is heated to atemperature of about 80° C. or less, or at or below 80° C. In stillanother embodiment, the film is heated to a temperature of about 75° C.or less, or at or below 75° C.

After heating, the resist image is developed in the film by art knowntechniques such as aqueous development. Suitably, the film is exposed toa solvent, suitably an aqueous base such as tetramethyl ammoniumhydroxide. The solvent removes the portions of the film which wereexposed to radiation to expose the underlying substrate. After thesubstrate has been exposed, circuit patterns can be formed on thesubstrate by coating the substrate with a conductive metal by art-knowntechniques.

The method of the present invention can also be used in immersionlithography where a thin film of liquid is disposed between thephotoresist film and the source of the radiation during the process ofexposing the film to radiation. This can be suitably done by flowing theliquid over the film during the exposure step or alternatively,immersing the film in the liquid during the exposure step. Suitableliquids have an index of refraction of about 1.40 or more and havesuitable properties for immersion lithography such as high transparencyand low viscosity. Suitable liquids include water, cyclooctane,cyclononane, cyclodecane, decahydronaphthalene, hydrindane,bicyclohexyl, ethylnorbornane, and tricyclo(5.2.1^(1,7).0^(2,6))decane(tetrahydrodicyclopentadiene).

The present invention also relates to method for the use of the polymerof the present invention as a top coat over a photoresist film in theprocess of forming an image on the substrate. In the method, after thephotoresist film has been disposed on the substrate, the material of thepresent invention is coated onto the photoresist film. The top coat ofthe material protects the photoresist film during processing (e.g., fromswelling and leaching of resist components such as PAGs into theimmersion fluid. The material also controls the surface energy andthereby the contact angle formed by the immersion fluid with thesurface. After the image has been formed on the substrate, the top coatcan be removed by art known techniques.

Suitably, the photoresist film used in the method of the presentinvention may be blended with one or more additional polymers,oligomers, or molecules (which may by themselves function asphotoresists) to afford properties desirable in a photoresist such asthermal or mechanical properties, dissolution properties, and etchresistance.

The present invention also relates to the use of the material of thepresent invention as an additive which is blended into a resistformulation and which enriches or populates the resist surface (airinterface) during film formation to form a protective layer in situ. Thematerial forming this protective layer may control the resist surface(surface energy, contact angles with immersion fluids, etc.) and/orcontrol PAG (or other resist component) leaching into the immersionfluid and/or afford the resist greater protection to environmentalcontaminants.

In addition, the photoresist film can further include one or moreadditional components including, but not limited to, a solvent,crosslinking agent, surfactant, basic compound, dissolution inhibitor,dissolution accelerator, adhesion promoter, defoaming agent, and otheradditives useful in providing desired properties.

The materials used in the present invention with the fluoroalcohol grouphave a pKa such that they can be dissolved in typical aqueous developersolution. However, in this invention their base-solubility is notintended to directly lead to dissolution of the photoresist film as thiswould increase dark loss. Instead, monomers and macromolecules with onlyone fluoroalcohol group which are not readily soluble in basic developerare preferred in this invention. The fluoroalcohol group plays severalroles. Primarily, the unique dissolution properties of the fluoroalcoholgroup (no/low initial swelling during development and stronginteractions with dissolution inhibitors) will control the dissolutionrate of the resist and boost image contrast. Secondarily, thefluoroalcohol group will increase the polarity of the reaction medium toaccelerate acid catalysis at lower temperature. Thirdly, the fluorinatedgroups will influence the surface energy of the resist and may offerhigher contact angles with immersion fluids such as water. Finally, theaddition of heavy fluoroalcohol groups may help prevent volatilization(e.g., outgassing) of the cleaved protecting group during exposure,limiting contamination of optical elements. Placement of thefluoroalcohol group on the protection group changes the solubilityswitch monomer into a multiple function component. This potentiallyaffords the ability to use fewer monomers in copolymerization to achievethe same photoresist properties, lowering the complexity of thepolymerization and lowering cost. It can also afford the possibility ofreplacing or reducing the content of another fluoroalcohol-containingmonomer in a resist polymer with, for example, less expensive monomersor monomers that influence other resist properties. The photoresistcompositions of this invention take advantage of the superiordissolution characteristics as well as their high polarity to affordhigh photospeed, rapid uniform dissolution, and excellent profiles.These monomers with fluoroalcohol-functionalized protecting groups areaccessible from commercially available materials in a more efficientmanner than many of the prior art compounds. In addition, these monomerscontain a moderate carbon to fluoroalcohol ratio to ensure thatbackground dissolution of the resist is low.

The acrylate and methacrylate-based monomers used in the method of thepresent invention and their corresponding polymers possess severaladvantages over conventional materials. These monomers readily undergofree-radical homopolymerization and free-radical copolymerization with avariety of other comonomers. These metal-free polymerizations aretolerant of many functionalities, are rapid and inexpensive, and providegood control over the molecular weight and polydispersity (especially ifa chain transfer agent is used). These monomers are also amenable toliving or controlled free-radical polymerization processes such asnitroxide-mediated living radical polymerization, atom-transfer radicalpolymerization (ATRP), group transfer polymerization, reversibleaddition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) and related techniques toprovide control over molecular weight, polydispersity, and chain-endfunctionality. Acrylate and methacrylate polymers are generally solublein conventional casting solvents and readily form uniform films whencast onto conventional substrates.

The cyclic olefin-based monomers used in the method of the presentinvention may be readily polymerized via free radical techniques onlywhen copolymerized with electron-deficient comonomers such as maleicanhydride or tetrafluoroethylene among others. Alternatively,metal-catalyzed polymerizations such as ring-opening metathesispolymerization or addition polymerization can be used to produce cyclicolefin homo- and copolymers. Norbornene-type polymers (especiallyaddition polymers) typically have very high etch resistance compared toacrylate and methacrylate-based photoresist materials. Suitablesynthesis of monomers used in method of the present invention is shownbelow.

EXAMPLE 1 Synthesis of1,1,1-trifluoro-2-trifluoromethyl-2-hydroxy-6-methyl-hept-6-ylmethacrylate (IV) Preparation of E-methyl6,6,6-trifluoro-5-hydroxy-5-(trifluoromethyl)hex-2-enoate (I)

To a nitrogen-flushed, 150 mL steel reaction vessel with teflon-coatedmagnetic stirbar was added 30.0 g methyl 3-buteneoate (300 mmol, 1 eq.).Hexafluoroacetone (55.8 g, 336 mmol, 1.1 eq.) was condensed into thevessel at −78° C. The reaction vessel was sealed under 1 atmosphere ofnitrogen and warmed to room temperature slowly. The reaction was heatedat 160° C. for 16 hours after which the pressure had decreaseddramatically. The vessel was cooled in an ice bath and the excesshexafluoroacetone was carefully vented through a saturated potassiumhydroxide solution. The crude reaction mixture was vacuum distilledusing a 6-inch, vacuum-jacketed vigereaux column with a short-pathdistillation head. The product was isolated at 75-80° C. (6 Torr) as acolorless liquid. A second distillation of the prefraction resulted in atotal isolated yield of 55.4 g (69%) of E-methyl6,6,6-trifluoro-5-hydroxy-5-(trifluoromethyl)hex-2-enoate (I).

Alternative preparation of E-methyl6,6,6-trifluoro-5-hydroxy-5-(trifluoromethyl)hex-2-enoate (I):

To a 250 mL 3 neck roundbottom flask with reflux condenser andTeflon-coated magnetic stir bar was added methyl acrylate (9.10 g, 105.7mmol, 1.1 eq.), 1,1,1-trifluoro-2-trifluoromethyl-pent-4-ene-2-ol (20 g,96.1 mmol, 1 eq.) and 100 mL of anhydrous dichloromethane. The solutionwas heated to reflux under nitrogen and 300 mg of the Hoveyda-Grubbs2^(nd) generation ruthenium metathesis catalyst (0.048 mmol, 0.005 eq.)was added in 4 portions over 4 hours. The reaction was heated anadditional 12 hours after which the product was purified by vacuumdistillation (65° C., 6 Torr) and column chromatography (silica gel,80:20 hexane:ethyl acetate eluent) to afford 16.7 g of methyl6,6,6-trifluoro-5-hydroxy-5-(trifluoromethyl)hex-2-enoate (I) ascolorless liquid (E/Z=2.15:1) contaminated with a small amount (0.15eq.) of1,1,1,8,8,8-hexafluoro-2,7-di(trifluoromethyl)-oct-4-ene-2,7-diol(E/Z=6.7:1).

Preparation of methyl6,6,6-trifluoro-5-hydroxy-5-(trifluoromethyl)hexanoate (II)

To a 330 mL thick-walled glass hydrogenation vessel was added 37.7 gE-methyl 6,6,6-trifluoro-5-hydroxy-5-(trifluoromethyl)hex-2-enoate (I)(141 mmol), 0.5 g palladium-on-carbon (5 wt % Pd), and 150 mL ethylacetate. The reaction vessel was attached to a Parr hydrogenationapparatus and the reaction solution degassed via three successivepump-backfill cycles with nitrogen. The reaction vessel was pressurizedto 40 psi with hydrogen and shaken at room temperature for 20 hours,after which the pressure had fallen to 34 psi. The excess hydrogen wasremoved via three successive pump-backfill cycles with nitrogen and thepalladium catalyst removed via filtration through 1.0 micron glass fiberand 0.2 micron PTFE filters. The solvent was removed in vacuo and thecrude reaction mixture distilled under vacuum (6 Torr, 64-74° C.) toafford 34.4 g (91%) of methyl6,6,6-trifluoro-5-hydroxy-5-(trifluoromethyl)hexanoate (II) as acolorless liquid.

Preparation of1,1,1-trifluoro-6-methyl-2-(trifluoromethyl)heptane-2,6-diol (III)

To a flame-dried, nitrogen-purged, 500 mL 3-neck roundbottom flask with250 mL, pressure-equalized addition funnel and stirbar was added 129 mLof methyl magnesium bromide (388 mmol, 3.1 eq., 3 M in ethyl ether). Adegassed solution of 33.5 g methyl6,6,6-trifluoro-5-hydroxy-5-(trifluoromethyl)hexanoate (II) (125 mmol, 1eq.) in 150 mL anhydrous tetrahydrofuran was charged to the additionfunnel and added dropwise to the reaction over the course of 1 hour atroom temperature. After 2 hours the large amount of precipitatenecessitated the addition of 100 mL additional anhydroustetrahydrofuran. The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 26hours, after which it was cooled to 0° C. and carefully quenched withdilute hydrochloric acid solution until the pH was less than 5.0. Thereaction solution was neutralized with saturated aqueous sodiumbicarbonate until the pH was greater than 8. The product was extractedinto ethyl ether and the organic phase washed with brine and dried overmagnesium sulfate, filtered, concentrated in vacuo, and stored over asmall amount of sodium bicarbonate. Only one product was observed by ¹⁹FNMR and the crude product (48.9 g) was carried on without furtherpurification.

Preparation of1,1,1-trifluoro-2-trifluoromethyl-2-hydroxy-6-methyl-hept-6-ylmethacrylate (IV)

To a flame-dried, nitrogen-purged 500 mL 3-neck roundbottom flask with250 mL pressure-equalizing addition funnel and magnetic stirbar wascharged 156 mL n-butyl lithium (250 mmol, 2 equiv., 1.6 M in hexanes). Adegassed solution of1,1,1-trifluoro-6-methyl-2-(trifluoromethyl)heptane-2,6-diol (III)(.about.125 mmol, 1 eq.) in 100 mL anhydrous tetrahydrofuran was chargedto the addition funnel and added to the reaction mixture dropwise at 0°C. over 30 minutes. The reaction mixture was warmed for 15 minutes on ahot water bath to ensure the reaction was complete. The reaction vesselwas cooled to 0° C. and 14.4 g methacryloyl chloride (138 mmol, 1.1 eq.)was added dropwise and allowed to stir for 15 minutes. The additionfunnel was replaced with a reflux condenser and the reaction heated toreflux for 20 hours. After the reaction was complete, it was cooled to0° C. and quenched with dilute HCl solution until the pH was less than5.0. The reaction solution was neutralized with saturated aqueous sodiumbicarbonate until the pH was greater than 8. The product was extractedinto ethyl ether and the organic phase washed sequentially with aqueoussodium bicarbonate, water, and brine and then dried over magnesiumsulfate, filtered, concentrated in vacuo, and stored over a small amountof sodium bicarbonate. The crude product mixture was purified via silicagel column chromatography (20:1 hexane:ethyl acetate eluent) to afford14.7 g (35%) of1,1,1-trifluoro-2-trifluoromethyl-2-hydroxy-6-methyl-hept-6-ylmethacrylate (IV) as a colorless liquid.

EXAMPLE 2 Synthesis of1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-((3-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-1-yl)methyl)propan-2-ylmethacrylate (VIII) Preparation of methyl3-(3,3,3-trifluoro-2-hydroxy-2-(trifluoromethyl)propyl)bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-1-5-ene-2-carboxylate(V)

To a 40 mL thick-walled glass pressure tube with Teflon-coated magneticstirbar was added 13.5 g E-methyl6,6,6-trifluoro-5-hydroxy-5-(trifluoromethyl)hex-2-enoate (I) (50.7mmol, 1 eq.) and 86.2 g freshly cracked dicyclopentadiene (86.2 mmol,1.7 eq.). The vessel was sealed under slight vacuum and heated on an oilbath at 150° C. for 19 hours after which NMR spectroscopy showed only 2%of starting material remaining and 80% conversion to product and 17%conversion to higher cyclopentadiene adducts. The crude reaction mixturewas distilled under vacuum using a short-path distillation apparatus(115° C., 6 Torr) to afford 12.5 g (74%) as a clear liquid (mixture ofisomers, 1:1 ratio).

Preparation of methyl3-(3,3,3-trifluoro-2-hydroxy-2-(trifluoromethyl)propyl)bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-ane-2-carboxylate(VI)

To a 330 mL thick-walled glass hydrogenation vessel was added 12.5 gmethyl3-(3,3,3-trifluoro-2-hydroxy-2-(trifluoromethyl)propyl)bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-ene-2-carboxylate(V) (37.6 mmol), 0.5 g palladium-on-carbon (5 wt % Pd), and 100 mLmethanol. The reaction vessel was attached to a Parr hydrogenationapparatus and the reaction solution degassed via three successivepump-backfill cycles with nitrogen. The reaction vessel was pressurizedto 40 psi with hydrogen and shaken at room temperature for 20 hours,after which the pressure had fallen to 34 psi. The excess hydrogen wasremoved via three successive pump-backfill cycles with nitrogen and thepalladium catalyst removed via filtration through 1.0 micron glass fiberand 0.2 micron PTFE filters. The solvent was removed in vacuo and thecrude reaction mixture distilled under vacuum (6 Torr, 110° C.) toafford 10.9 g (87%) of methyl3-(3,3,3-trifluoro-2-hydroxy-2-(trifluoromethyl)propyl)bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-ane-2-carboxylate(VI) as a colorless liquid (mixture of isomers, 1:1 ratio).

Preparation of 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-((3-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan2-yl)methyl)propan-2-ol (VII)

To a flame-dried, nitrogen-purged, 500 mL 3-neck roundbottom flask with250 mL, pressure-equalized addition funnel and stirbar was added 38 mLof methyl magnesium bromide (114 mmol, 3.5 eq., 3 M in ethyl ether). Adegassed solution of 10.9 g methyl3-(3,3,3-trifluoro-2-hydroxy-2-(trifluoromethyl)propyl)bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-ane-2-carboxylate(VI) (32.6 mmol, 1 eq.) in 75 mL anhydrous tetrahydrofuran was chargedto the addition funnel and added dropwise to the reaction over thecourse of 1 hour at room temperature. The reaction was stirred at roomtemperature for 14 hours, after which it was cooled to 0° C. andcarefully quenched with dilute hydrochloric acid solution until the pHwas less than 5.0. The reaction solution was neutralized with saturatedaqueous sodium bicarbonate until the pH was greater than 8. The productwas extracted into ethyl ether and the organic phase washed with brineand dried over magnesium sulfate, filtered, concentrated in vacuo, andstored over a small amount of sodium bicarbonate. Only 2 products (˜1:1)were observed by ¹⁹F NMR and the crude product (12.4 g) was carried onwithout further purification.

Preparation of 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-((3-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl)methyl)propan-2-yl methacrylate (VIII):

To a flame-dried, nitrogen-purged 250 mL 3-neck roundbottom flask with50 mL pressure-equalizing addition funnel and magnetic stirbar wascharged 141 mL n-butyl lithium (65 mmol, 2 equiv., 1.6 M in hexanes). Adegassed solution of1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-((3-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-1-yl)methyl)propan-2-ol(VII) (˜33 mmol, 1 eq.) in 50 mL anhydrous tetrahydrofuran was chargedto the addition funnel was added to the reaction mixture dropwise at 0°C. over 30 minutes. The reaction mixture was warmed for 15 minutes on anoil bath at 70° C. to ensure the reaction was complete. The reactionvessel was cooled to 0° C. and 3.75 g methacryloyl chloride (36 mmol,1.1 eq.) was added dropwise and allowed to stir for 15 minutes. Theaddition funnel was replaced with a reflux condenser and the reactionheated to reflux for 20 hours. After the reaction was complete, it wascooled to 0° C. and quenched with dilute HCl solution until the pH wasless than 5.0. The reaction solution was neutralized with saturatedaqueous sodium bicarbonate until the pH was greater than 8. The productwas extracted into ethyl ether and the organic phase washed sequentiallywith aqueous sodium bicarbonate, water, and brine and then dried overmagnesium sulfate, filtered, concentrated in vacuo, and stored over asmall amount of sodium bicarbonate. The crude product mixture waspurified via silica gel column chromatography (20:1 hexane:ethyl acetateeluent) to afford 4.0 g (30%) of1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-((3-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-1-yl)methyl)propan-2-ylmethacrylate (VIII) as a colorless liquid (.about.1.35:1 isomer ratio).

EXAMPLE 3 Synthesis of2-(1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-1-methylcyclohex-1-ylmethacrylate (XII) Preparation of2-(1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)cyclohexanone (IX)

To a 1 L roundbottom flask with stirbar was added 22.9 g sodium iodide(152 mmol, 1.25 eq.). The vessel was flame-dried under vacuum todehydrate the salt. After cooling to room temperature, 150 mL anhydrousacetonitrile was added and stirred until the NaI had dissolved.Anhydrous pentane (125 mL) was added via cannula followed by 12 gcyclohexanone (122 mmol, 1 eq.) and 16 g anhydrous triethylamine (159mmol, 1.25 eq.). The vessel was cooled to 0° C. and 16.5 gtrimethylsilyl chloride (152 mmol, 1.25 eq.) was added via syringe. Thereaction was stirred overnight at room temperature after which theacetonitrile layer was extracted into 2×250 mL anhydrous pentane. Thecombined pentane fractions were washed with ice cold ammonium chloridesolution, dried over magnesium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated invacuo to afford the crude trimethylsilyl enol ether, which was carriedon without further purification.

To a flame-dried, nitrogen-purged 3-neck roundbottom flask withcoldfinger condenser and stirbar was charged the crude trimethylsilylenol ether of cyclohexanone. Hexafluoroacetone was condensed into aflask using dry ice and acetone in the coldfinger condenser while thereaction was kept at room temperature. Hexafluoroacetone was added asneeded over the next 4 hours as aliquots of the reaction were monitoredvia NMR. Upon completion, the excess hexafluoroacetone was carefullyvented through saturated potassium hydroxide solution and the solventremoved in vacuo. The crude product was dissolved in 100 mL methanol andthe trimethylsilyl group removed with 8.43 g potassium carbonate (61mmol, 0.5 eq.). After stirring for 2.5 hours, the reaction was acidifiedwith dilute HCl solution until the pH reached 5.0. The product wasextracted into ethyl ether and washed sequentially with aqueous sodiumbicarbonate, water, and brine, dried over magnesium sulfate, filtered,and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was distilled using avacuum-jacketed short-path distillation hear (6 Torr, 110° C.) to afford18.7 g (58%) of2-(1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)cyclohexanone (IX).

Preparation of2-(1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-1-methylcyclohexanol (X)

To a flame-dried, nitrogen-purged, 250 mL 3-neck roundbottom flask with50 mL, pressure-equalized addition funnel and stirbar was added 48 mL ofmethyl magnesium bromide (143 mmol, 2.1 eq., 3 M in ethyl ether). Adegassed solution of 18 g methyl2-(1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)cyclohexanone (IX) (68mmol, 1 eq.) in 60 mL anhydrous tetrahydrofuran was charged to theaddition funnel and added dropwise to the reaction over the course of 1hour at room temperature. The reaction was stirred at room temperaturefor 14 hours, after which it was cooled to 0° C. and carefully quenchedwith dilute hydrochloric acid solution until the pH was less than 5.0.The reaction solution was neutralized with saturated aqueous sodiumbicarbonate until the pH was greater than 8. The product was extractedinto ethyl ether and the organic phase washed with brine and dried overmagnesium sulfate, filtered, concentrated in vacuo, and stored over asmall amount of sodium bicarbonate. Crude .sup.1H and .sup.19F NMRindicated only 42% conversion to a single isomer. The reaction wasrepeated again and the conversion driven to 69% by NMR. The crudeproduct was taken on to the next step without further purification.

Preparation of2-(1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-1-methylcyclohex-1-ylmethacrylate (XII)

To a flame-dried, nitrogen-purged 250 mL 3-neck roundbottom flask with50 mL pressure-equalizing addition funnel and magnetic stirbar wascharged 85 mL n-butyl lithium (136 mmol, 2 equiv., 1.6 M in hexanes). Adegassed solution of12-(1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-hydroxypropan2-yl)-1-methylcyclohexanol (X)(.about.68 mmol, 1 eq.) in 50 mL anhydrous tetrahydrofuran was chargedto the addition funnel and added to the reaction mixture dropwise at 0°C. over 30 minutes. The reaction mixture was warmed for 15 minutes on ahot water bath to ensure the reaction was complete. The reaction vesselwas cooled to 0° C. and 7.46 g methacryloyl chloride (71.4 mmol, 1.05eq.) was added dropwise and allowed to stir for 15 minutes. The additionfunnel was replaced with a reflux condenser and the reaction heated toreflux for 20 hours. After the reaction was complete, it was cooled to0° C. and quenched with dilute HCl solution until the pH was less than5.0. The reaction solution was neutralized with saturated aqueous sodiumbicarbonate until the pH was greater than 8. The product was extractedinto ethyl ether and the organic phase washed sequentially with aqueoussodium bicarbonate, water, and brine and then dried over magnesiumsulfate, filtered, concentrated in vacuo, and stored over a small amountof sodium bicarbonate. The crude product mixture was purified via silicagel column chromatography (20:1 hexane:ethyl acetate eluent) to afford3.08 of2-(1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-1-methylcyclohex-1-ylmethacrylate (XII) as a colorless liquid (1 isomer) of only 66% purity.After standing in the refrigerator overnight,2-(1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-1-methylcyclohex-1-ylmethacrylate (XII) crystallizes out of the mixture a white crystallinesolid.

EXAMPLE 4 Synthesis of 2-methylhexan-2-yl methacrylate (XIII)

To a flame-dried, nitrogen-purged 500 mL 3-neck roundbottom flask with250 mL pressure-equalizing addition funnel and magnetic stirbar wascharged 81 mL n-butyl lithium (129 mmol, 1 equiv., 1.6 M in hexanes). Adegassed solution of 15.0 g 2-methyl-2-hexanol (129 mmol, 1 eq.) in 100mL anhydrous tetrahydrofuran was charged to the addition funnel andadded to the reaction mixture dropwise at 0° C. over 60 minutes. Thereaction mixture was warmed for 15 minutes on hot water bath to ensurethe reaction was complete. The reaction vessel was cooled to 0° C. and14.2 g methacryloyl chloride (135 mmol, 1.05 eq.) was added dropwise andallowed to stir for 15 minutes. The addition funnel was replaced with areflux condenser and the reaction heated to reflux for 20 hours. Afterthe reaction was complete, it was cooled to 0° C. and quenched aqueoussodium bicarbonate. The product was extracted into ethyl ether and theorganic phase washed sequentially with aqueous sodium bicarbonate,water, and brine and then dried over magnesium sulfate, filtered,concentrated in vacuo, and stored over a small amount of sodiumbicarbonate. The crude product mixture was vacuum distilled through avacuum-jacketed short-path distillation head to afford 14 g (59%) of2-methylhexan-2-yl methacrylate (XIII) as a colorless liquid.

EXAMPLE 5 Synthesis of a Homopolymer of1,1,1-trifluoro-2-trifluoromethyl-2-hydroxy-6-methyl-heptan-6-ylmethacrylate: Poly(IV)

1,1,1-trifluoro-2-trifluoromethyl-2-hydroxy-6-methyl-heptan-6-ylmethacrylate (IV) (2.5 g, 7.4 mmol, 1 eq.), 1-dodecanethiol (0.045 g,0.22 mmol, 0.03 eq.), and 2,2′-azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) (0.049 g,0.30 mmol, 0.04 eq.) were added to a 100 mL roundbottom flask withreflux condenser and dissolved in 5 mL of inhibitor-freetetrahydrofuran. The solution was degassed via 3 sequentialpump-backfill cycles with nitrogen. The reaction was then heated toreflux for 21 hours. The solution was added dropwise to 500 mL ofhexanes and the precipitated polymer was subsequently isolated on afilter frit, washed twice with hexanes, and dried under vacuum at 40° C.overnight. Yield: 1.49 g (60%).

EXAMPLE 6 Synthesis of a Copolymer of1,1,1-trifluoro-2-trifluoromethyl-2-hydroxy-6-methyl-hept-6-ylmethacrylate and hydroxyadamantyl methacrylate: Poly(IV-co-HAdMa)

1,1,1-trifluoro-2-trifluoromethyl-2-hydroxy-6-methyl-hept-6-ylmethacrylate (IV) (2.0 g, 7.4 mmol, 0.4 eq.), hydroxyadamanthylmethacrylate (HAdMa) (2.10 g, 8.9 mmol, 0.6 eq.), 1-dodecanethiol (0.090g, 0.45 mmol, 0.03 eq.), and 2,2′-azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) (0.098g, 0.59 mmol, 0.04 eq.) were added to a 100 mL roundbottom flask withreflux condenser and dissolved in 10 mL of inhibitor-freetetrahydrofuran. The solution was degassed via 3 sequentialpump-backfill cycles with nitrogen. The reaction was then heated toreflux for 23 hours. The solution was added dropwise to 500 mL ofhexanes and the precipitated polymer was subsequently isolated on afilter frit, washed twice with hexanes, and dried under vacuum at 60° C.overnight. Yield: 3.95 g (96%).

EXAMPLE 7 Synthesis of a Copolymer of1,1,1-trifluoro-2-trifluoromethyl-2-hydroxy-6-methyl-hept-6-ylmethacrylate and 4-oxa-tricyclo[4.2.1.0.sup 3,7]non-5-one-2ylmethacrylate: Poly(IV-co-NLM)

1,1,1-trifluoro-2-trifluoromethyl-2-hydroxy-6-methyl-hept-6-ylmethacrylate (IV) (2.0 g, 5.9 mmol, 0.4 eq.),4-oxa-tricyclo[4.2.1.0^(3,7)]non-5-one-2yl (NLM) (1.98 g, 8.9 mmol, 0.6eq.), 1-dodecanethiol (0.090 g, 0.45 mmol, 0.03 eq.), and2,2′-azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) (0.098 g, 0.59 mmol, 0.04 eq.) wereadded to a 100 mL roundbottom flask with reflux condenser and dissolvedin 10 mL of inhibitor-free tetrahydrofuran. The solution was degassedvia 3 sequential pump-backfill cycles with nitrogen. The reaction wasthen heated to reflux for 21 hours. The solution was added dropwise to500 mL of hexanes and the precipitated polymer was subsequently isolatedon a filter frit, washed twice with hexanes, and dried under vacuum at60° C. overnight. Yield: 3.75 g (94%).

EXAMPLE 8 Synthesis of a Copolymer of1,1,1-trifluoro-2-trifluoromethyl-2-hydroxy-6-methyl-hept-6-ylmethacrylat-eand5-(3,3,3-trifluoro-2-hydroxy-2-(trifluoromethyl)propyl)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptanylmethacrylate: Poly(IV-co-NBHFA-Ma)

1,1,1-trifluoro-2-trifluoromethyl-2-hydroxy-6-methyl-hept-6-ylmethacrylate (IV) (2.0 g, 7.4 mmol, 0.4 eq.),5-(3,3,3-trifluoro-2-hydroxy-2-(trifluoromethyl)propyl)bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-anylmethacrylate (NBHFA-Ma) (3.19 g, 8.9 mmol, 0.6 eq.), 1-dodecanethiol(0.090 g, 0.45 mmol, 0.03 eq.), and 2,2′-azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN)(0.098 g, 0.59 mmol, 0.04 eq.) were added to a 100 mL roundbottom flaskwith reflux condenser and dissolved in 10 mL of inhibitor-freetetrahydrofuran. The solution was degassed via 3 sequentialpump-backfill cycles with nitrogen. The reaction was then heated toreflux for 23 hours. The solution was added dropwise to 500 mL ofhexanes and the precipitated polymer was subsequently isolated on afilter frit, washed twice with hexanes, and dried under vacuum at 60° C.overnight. Yield: 4.04 g (78%).

EXAMPLE 9 Synthesis of a Terpolymer of1,1,1-trifluoro-2-trifluoromethyl-2-hydroxy-6-methyl-hept-6-ylmethacrylate,5-(3,3,3-trifluoro-2-hydroxy-2-(trifluoromethyl)propyl)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptanylmethacrylate, and 4-oxa-tricyclo[4.2.1.0^(3,7)]non-5-one-2-ylmethacrylate Poly(IV-co-NBHFA-Ma-co-NLM)

1,1,1-trifluoro-2-trifluoromethyl-2-hydroxy-6-methyl-hept-6-ylmethacrylate (IV) (1.0 g, 3.0 mmol, 0.45 eq.),5-(3,3,3-trifluoro-2-hydroxy-2-(trifluoromethyl)propyl)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptanylmethacrylate (NBHFA-Ma) (0.36 g, 0.99 mmol, 0.15 eq.), (NLM) (0.59 g,2.6 mmol, 0.40 eq.), 1-dodecanethiol (0.040 g, 0.20 mmol, 0.03 eq.), and2,2′-azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) (0.043 g, 0.26 mmol, 0.04 eq.) wereadded to a 100 mL roundbottom flask with reflux condenser and dissolvedin 8 mL of inhibitor-free tetrahydrofuran. The solution was degassed via3 sequential pump-backfill cycles with nitrogen. The reaction was thenheated to reflux for 23 hours. The solution was added dropwise to 500 mLof hexanes and the precipitated polymer was subsequently isolated on afilter frit, washed twice with hexanes, and dried under vacuum at 60° C.overnight. Yield: 1.55 g (79%).

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 10 Synthesis of a copolymer of 2-methylhexan-2-ylmethacrylate and5-(3,3,3-trifluoro-2-hydroxy-2-(trifluoromethyl)propyl)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptanylmethacrylate: Poly(XIII-co-NBHFA-Ma)

12-Methylhexan-2-yl methacrylate (XII) (0.5 g, 2.7 mmol, 0.4 eq.),5-(3,3,3-trifluoro-2-hydroxy-2-(trifluoromethyl)propyl)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptanylmethacrylate (NBHFA-Ma) (1.47 g, 4.1 mmol, 0.6 eq.), 1-dodecanethiol(0.041 g, 0.20 mmol, 0.03 eq.), and 2,2′-azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN)(0.045 g, 0.27 mmol, 0.04 eq.) were added to a 100 mL roundbottom flaskwith reflux condenser and dissolved in 7 mL of inhibitor-freetetrahydrofuran. The solution was degassed via 3 sequentialpump-backfill cycles with nitrogen. The reaction was then heated toreflux for 18 hours. The solution was added dropwise to 500 mL ofhexanes and the precipitated polymer was subsequently isolated on afilter frit, washed twice with hexanes, and dried under vacuum at 80° C.overnight. Yield: 1.18 g (60%).

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 11 Synthesis of a terpolymer of 2-methylhexan-2-ylmethacrylate,5-(3,3,3-trifluoro-2-hydroxy-2-(trifluoromethyl)propyl)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptanylmethacrylate, and 4-oxa-tricyclo[4.2.1.0^(3,7)]non-5-one-2-ylmethacrylate: Poly(XIII-co-NBHFA-Ma-co-NLM)

2-Methylhexan-2-yl methacrylate (XII) (0.6 g, 3.3 mmol, 0.45 eq.),5-(3,3,3-trifluoro-2-hydroxy-2-(trifluoromethyl)propyl)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptanylmethacrylate (NBHFA-Ma) (0.39 g, 1.1 mmol, 0.15 eq.), (NLM) (0.64 g, 2.9mmol, 0.40 eq.), 1-dodecanethiol (0.044 g, 0.22 mmol, 0.03 eq.), and2,2′-azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) (0.048 g, 0.29 mmol, 0.04 eq.) wereadded to a 100 mL roundbottom flask with reflux condenser and dissolvedin 7 mL of inhibitor-free tetrahydrofuran. The solution was degassed via3 sequential pump-backfill cycles with nitrogen. The reaction was thenheated to reflux for 18 hours. The solution was added dropwise to 500 mLof hexanes and the precipitated polymer was subsequently isolated on afilter frit, washed twice with hexanes, and dried under vacuum at80.degree. C. overnight. Yield: 1.37 g (84%).

EXAMPLES 12-27 Lithographic Imaging: General Procedures

Resists were formulated as 12 wt % solids in propylene glycol methylether acetate (PGMEA) or PGMEA/gamma-butyrolactone (85:15 by wt,respectively). The solids content consisted of resist polymer plus4-butoxynaphth-1-yl tetramethylenesulfonium nonaflate photoacidgenerator (5 wt %) and 2-phenyl benzimidazole quencher (0.34 wt %). Thesolutions were filtered through a 0.2 micron PTFE filter prior tospincasting onto a silicon wafers (which had been previously coated withRohm & Haas AR24 anti-reflective coating) at 3000 rpm for 60 seconds.The film was subjected to a post-application bake of 130° C. for 60seconds. Exposure was performed on an Ultratech 193 nm ministepper (0.6NA) with a binary (chrome on glass) mask. The post-exposure bake wasperformed on a thermal gradient hotplate for 60 seconds. Development wasperformed using Rohm & Haas LDD-26W developer for 60 seconds. Thicknessmeasurements were obtained using a NanoSpec 6100 (Nanometrics). Contrastcurves were obtained using a thermal gradient plate as described inLarson et al., Proc. SPIE 5376, 1165-1173.

EXAMPLE 12

Contrast curve for Poly(IV) is shown in FIG. 1. Good contrast isobtained at low post-exposure bake temperatures down to 60° C. as seenin FIG. 1. This is in stark contrast to resists formulated with lessfluoroalcohol (see Examples 13 and 14) where much higher PEBtemperatures are required. This homopolymer, while capable of serving asa high photospeed resist, suffers from moderate dark loss which can beremedied through copolymerization with appropriate comonomers (seeExamples 18 and 19).

EXAMPLE 13

Contrast curve for Poly(IV-co-HAdMa) is shown in FIG. 2. Note high PEBtemperatures required due to less polar HAdMa groups. While no dark lossis evident, photospeed is decreased.

EXAMPLE 14

Contrast curve for Poly(IV-co-NLM) is shown in FIG. 3. Incorporation ofNLM raises PEB temperatures and decreases photospeed while eliminatingdark loss.

EXAMPLE 15

Dissolution measurements of Poly(IV) and Poly(IV-co-NLM) are shown inFIG. 4. Dissolution rate of Poly(IV) is consistent with observed darkloss in Example 12.

EXAMPLE 16

Lithographic image of Poly(IV-co-HAdMa) is shown in FIG. 5.

EXAMPLE 17

Lithographic image of Poly(IV-co-NLM) is shown in FIG. 6.

EXAMPLE 18

Contrast curve for Poly(IV-co-NBHFA-Ma) is shown in FIG. 7.Incorporation of NBHFA-Ma results in slight increase in PEB and slightdecrease in photospeed, but eliminates dark loss.

EXAMPLE 19

Contrast curve for Poly(IV-co-NBHFA-Ma-co-NLM) is shown in FIG. 8.Terpolymerization again results in slight increase in PEB and slightdecrease in photospeed, but results in very high contrast.

EXAMPLES 20 and 21

Lithographic images of Poly(IV-co-NBHFA-Ma) andPoly(IV-co-NBHFA-Ma-co-NLM) are shown in FIG. 9. 120 nm images can beobtained with good sidewall profiles and good clearing of the resist atthe bottom of the channels.

EXAMPLE 22

Contrast curve for comparative example Poly(XIII-co-NBHFA-Ma) is shownin FIG. 10. This compares to example 18 with a non-functionalizedtertiary ester solubility switch. Note higher PEBs and lowerphotospeeds.

EXAMPLE 23

Contrast curve for comparative example Poly(XIII-co-NBHFA-Ma-co-NLM) isshown in FIG. 11. This compares to example 19 with a non-functionalizedtertiary ester solubility switch. Note higher PEBs, lower photospeeds.

EXAMPLES 24 and 25

Lithographic imaging of comparative examples Poly(XIII-co-NBHFA-Ma) andPoly(XIII-co-NBHFA-Ma-co-NLM) is shown in FIG. 12. These compare toexamples 20 and 21 with a non-functionalized tertiary ester solubilityswitch. Note environmental sensitivity and line collapse.

EXAMPLE 26

Contrast curve for a 1:1 blend of Poly(IV-co-NBHFA-Ma) andPoly(XIII-co-NBHFA-Ma) is shown in FIG. 13. Note slightly slowerphotospeed, slightly higher PEB, and slightly increased contrast.

EXAMPLE 27

Lithographic imaging of a 1:1 blend of Poly(IV-co-NBHFA-Ma) andPoly(XIII-co-NBHFA-Ma) is shown in FIG. 14. Good profiles but increasedT-topping (characteristic of the Poly(XIII-co-NBHFA-Ma).

The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in thecontext of describing the invention (especially in the context of thefollowing claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and theplural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted bycontext. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended toserve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separatevalue falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, andeach separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it wereindividually recited herein. The use of any and all examples, orexemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merelyto better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on thescope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. No language in thespecification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed elementas essential to the practice of the invention.

Although this invention has been described with respect to specificembodiments, the details thereof are not to be construed as limitations,for it will be apparent that various embodiments, changes andmodifications may be resorted to without departing from the spirit andscope thereof and it is understood that such equivalent embodiments areintended to be included within the scope of this invention.

We claim:
 1. A method for generating a photoresist image on a substratecomprising: (a) coating the substrate with a photoresist film comprising(i) a macromolecule or a polymer comprising a monomer, and (ii) aphotoacid generator, wherein the macromolecule and the monomer have theformula:

where R₀ is selected from a molecular glass, C₂₋₂₀ alkylenyl andfluorinated alkylenyl, C₄₋₄₀ cycloalkylenyl, and fluorinatedcycloalkylenyl, each optionally substituted with one or moreheteroatoms; R₁ and R₂ are independently selected from C₁₋₂₀ alkyl andfurther R₁ and R₂ can be bonded together to form a cyclic group; L is adivalent C₁₋₂₀ alkyleneyl or cycloalkyleneyl optionally substituted withone or more substituents selected from C₁₋₂₀ alkyl and fluoroalkyl, andC₄₋₃₀ cycloalkyl optionally substituted with one or more substituentsselected from one or more fluoro and heteroatom substituents; R₄ isselected from hydrido, trifluoromethyl, difluoromethyl, fluoromethyl,C₁₋₂₀ alkyl and C₄₋₂₀ cycloalkyl each optionally substituted with one ormore fluoro substituents; and R₅ is selected from trifluoromethyl,difluoromethyl, fluoromethyl, C₁₋₂₀ alkyl, and C₄₋₂₀ cycloalkyl eachsubstituted with one or more fluoro substituents, and further R₄ and R₅can be linked to form a cyclic group; (b) imagewise exposing the film toradiation, wherein a liquid is disposed on the film during exposure ofthe film to radiation and the liquid has an index of refraction of about1.40 or more; (c) heating the film to a temperature at or below about90° C.; and (d) developing the image to the substrate.
 2. The method ofclaim 1, where R₀ has the formula:

where R₆, R₇ and R₈ are independently select from hydrido, fluoro, andC₁₋₄ alkyl.
 3. The method of claim 1, where R₀ has the formula:

where R₉ is selected from hydrido, fluoro, and C₁₋₂₀ alkyl optionallysubstituted with one or more fluoro substituents; R₁₀ and R₁₁ areindependently selected from hydrido, fluoro, and C₁₋₂₀ alkyl; each X isa divalent substituent independently selected from carbonyl, oxygen,sulfur, methylene, ethylene, >C(R₁₂)(R₁₃), >C═CHR₁₂, >C═C(R₁₂)(R₁₃,)and >NR where R, R₁₂ and R₁₃ are independently selected from hydrido,fluoro, and C₁₋₂₀ alkyl optionally substituted with one or more fluorosubstituents and where R₁₂ and R₁₃ can be linked to form a cyclic group;and where y is 0 to 4 and where z is 0 or
 1. 4. The method of claim 1,where the film is heated to a temperature at or below 80° C.
 5. Themethod of claim 1, where the film is heated to a temperature at or below75° C.
 6. The method of claim 1, where the monomer has fluorosubstituents only on R₄ and R₅.
 7. The method of claim 1, where theliquid is water.
 8. The method of claim 1, where the polymer has amolecular weight of about 1000 to about 100,000 daltons.
 9. The methodof claim 1, where L is selected from propyleneyl and—CHR₁₄—CHR₁₅—CH₂—CH₂— where R₁₄ and R₁₅ are independently selected fromC₁₋₂₀ alkyl optionally substituted with one or more fluoro substituents,provided that R₂ and R₁₄ can be linked to form a cyclic group and thatR₁₄ and R₁₅ can be linked to form a cyclic group.
 10. The method ofclaim 9, where the film is heated to a temperature at or below about 80°C.
 11. The method of claim 1, where the film comprises a second polymerhaving the same formula as the polymer in claim 1 except that R₄ and R₅are each independently selected from hydrido, C₁₋₂₀ alkyl, and C₄₋₂₀cycloalkyl.
 12. A method for generating a photoresist image on asubstrate comprising: coating the substrate with a photoresist filmcomprising (i) a macromolecule or a polymer comprising a monomer, and(ii) a photoacid generator, wherein the macromolecule and the monomerhave the formula:

where R⁰ is selected from a molecular glass, C₂₋₂₀ alkylenyl andfluorinated alkylenyl, and C₄₋₄₀ cycloalkylenyl and fluorinatedcycloalkylenyl, each optionally substituted with one or moreheteroatoms; R₁ and R₂ are independently selected from C₁₋₂₀ alkyl andfurther R₁ and R₂ can be bonded together to form a cyclic group; R₁₆ isC₁₋₂₀ alkyl substituted with one or more fluoro substituents and whereR₁₆ and R₂ can be linked to form a cyclic group; R₄ is selected fromhydrido, trifluoromethyl, difluoromethyl, fluoromethyl, C₁₋₂₀ alkyl, andC₄₋₂₀ cycloalkyl each optionally substituted with one or more fluorosubstituents; and R₅ is selected from trifluoromethyl, difluoromethyl,fluoromethyl, C₁₋₂₀ alkyl, and C₄₋₂₀ cycloalkyl each substituted withone or more fluoro substituents and further R₄ and R₅ can be linked toform a cyclic group; (b) imagewise exposing the film to radiation,wherein a liquid is disposed on the film during exposure of the film toradiation and the liquid has an index of refraction of 1.40 or more; (c)heating the film to a temperature at or below about 90° C.; and (d)developing the image to the substrate.
 13. The method of claim 12, wherethe film is heated to a temperature at or below about 80° C.
 14. Themethod of claim 12, where the film is heated to a temperature at orbelow 75° C.
 15. The method of claim 12, where the liquid is water. 16.The method of claim 12, where R₀ has the formula:

where R₆, R₇ and R₈ are independently select from hydrido, fluoro, andC₁₋₄ alkyl.
 17. The method of claim 12, where R₀ has the formula:

where R₉ is selected from hydrido, fluoro, and C₁₋₂₀ alkyl optionallysubstituted with one or more fluoro substituents; R₁₀ and R₁₁ areindependently selected from hydrido, fluoro, and C₁₋₂₀ alkyl; each X isa divalent substituent independently selected from carbonyl, oxygen,sulfur, methylene, ethylene, >C(R₁₂)(R₁₃), >C═CHR₁₂, >C═C(R₁₂)(R₁₃,)and >NR where R, R₁₂ and R₁₃ are independently selected from hydrido,fluoro, and C₁₋₂₀ alkyl optionally substituted with one or more fluorosubstituents and where R₁₂ and R₁₃ can be linked to form a cyclic group;and where y is 0 to 4 and where z is 0 or
 1. 18. The method of claim 12,where the monomer has fluoro substituents only on R₄ and R₅.
 19. Themethod of claim 12, where the polymer has a molecular weight of about1000 to about 100,000 daltons.
 20. The method of claim 12, where thefilm comprises a second polymer having the same formula as the polymerin claim 12 except that R₄ and R₅ are each independently selected fromhydrido, C₁₋₂₀ alkyl, and C₄₋₂₀ cycloalkyl.